Crypto casino RTP tracker
The short answer
Average slot return-to-player across the casinos we track, ordered highest first. BitStarz leads at 96.8%. These figures are tracked against provider documentation rather than taken from casino marketing, and each carries the date it was last checked.
Last updated:
Ordered by measured data, not editorial ranking.
| # | Casino | Average slot RTP | Withdrawal speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BitStarz9.1/10 | 9 min 22 sec average (BTC)Brief manual review on the first withdrawal; ETH averaged around 11 minutes. | 96.8% |
| 2 | Gamdom9.7/10 | ~14 min average (BTC)15-minute default pending window, disableable in account settings. | 96.3% |
| 3 | Roobet8.6/10 | ~12 min average (BTC)Email confirmation required on the first withdrawal. | 96.2% |
| 4 | BC.Game9.3/10 | 4 min 11 sec benchmark (0.005 BTC)Fastest single withdrawal of the whole test cleared in 2 min 14 sec. No pending period for verified accounts. | 96.1% |
| 5 | Stake9.5/10 | Under 5 min (BTC)No mandatory pending period at standard amounts. | 96.0% |
Source: BetJudge RTP tracking against provider documentation — Last verified:
Source: BetJudge RTP tracking against provider documentation — highest tracked in our index — Last verified:
What this number does and does not tell you
RTP is a long-run average across a game’s entire lifetime of play, not a prediction of any session. A 96.8% average means that across millions of spins the games return 96.8% of what is wagered — it does not mean a given hour of play returns anything close to that.
What it is genuinely useful for is comparison. A 0.8 percentage point gap between two platforms is a real, structural difference in the cost of playing there, and it compounds with every wager. That is why we track it separately from bonuses: a generous bonus on a low-RTP library can be worth less than no bonus on a high-RTP one.
Why the figures are averages, not per-game
Individual slots publish their own RTP, and within one casino the range can run from about 94% to above 98% depending on the provider and the title. The averages here describe the library as a whole, weighted towards the games actually surfaced to players.
A per-game tracker is more precise but far more volatile, because operators rotate their catalogue constantly. The library average is the figure that stays meaningful for the length of time between our checks.